IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Gagno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 52 9 9 18 0.346 0.1290 0.1344 0.5044 0.5257
2022-23 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 42 18 22 40 0.952 0.3548 0.3524 1.3877 1.3782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 37 6 11 17 0.460
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 33 4 9 13 0.394
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 33 3 10 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Holy Cross
+73.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19711
Forward overall
#1013
Forward born in 2003
#1050
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Lindauer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.