IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Bonkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Powell River Kings BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Powell River Kings BCHL 20 3 13 16 0.800 0.3082 0.3082 1.1635 1.1635
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 54 11 20 31 0.574 0.2212 0.2294 0.8350 0.8660
2022-23 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 27 27 54 1.019 0.3926 0.3879 1.4819 1.4643
2023-24 — BCHL 42 11 10 21 0.500 0.1926 0.1815 0.7272 0.6852
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21285
Forward overall
#1111
Forward born in 2003
#1062
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Cherniak
Lawrence · 2024-25
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Rufa
Southern New Hampshire · 2024-25
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Routledge
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.