IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Leibl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 20 5 1 6 0.300 0.1156 0.1156 0.4371 0.4371
2021-22 — BCHL 40 4 5 9 0.225 0.0867 0.0837 0.3278 0.3165
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 45 7 10 17 0.378 0.1456 0.1334 0.5505 0.5046
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC GR 30 11 12 23 0.767
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 2 7 0.280
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 19 3 3 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2023-24 · Hamilton
+224.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43218
Forward overall
#2727
Forward born in 2002
#2476
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Perichak
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Lappin
Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.