← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Della Paolera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 5 2 4 6 1.200 0.3467 0.3467 0.9034 0.9034
2021-22 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 58 18 38 56 0.966 0.2789 0.2653 0.7268 0.6912
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 28 5 18 23 0.821
2024-25 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 26 11 18 29 1.115
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 24 8 8 16 0.667
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 20 7 10 17 0.850
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2022-23 · Anna Maria
+274.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12100
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2010-11
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.