← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Raymond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 17 9 26 0.867 0.1717 0.1717 0.3949 0.3949
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 30 9 9 18 0.600 0.1189 0.1189 0.2734 0.2734
2020-21 Powell River Kings BCHL 19 5 10 15 0.789 0.3042 0.3042 1.1490 1.1490
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 9 9 18 0.500
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 35 4 7 11 0.314
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 39 5 5 10 0.256
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 20 2 2 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2021-22 · Colgate
+66.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22075
Forward overall
#1081
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2012-13
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.