← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Panetta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wellington Dukes OJHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.1057 0.1178 0.2409 0.2686
2018-19 Wellington Dukes OJHL 51 8 15 23 0.451 0.1355 0.1444 0.3087 0.3290
2019-20 Wellington Dukes OJHL 54 18 26 44 0.815 0.2448 0.2448 0.5577 0.5577
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 14 4 5 9 0.643 0.2395 0.2395 0.9368 0.9368
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 20 21 41 0.759 0.2828 0.2613 1.1064 1.0222
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 37 3 9 12 0.324
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 25 10 3 13 0.520
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 13 16 29 0.806
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 34 5 6 11 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Colgate
+76.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19873
Forward overall
#929
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.