IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philippe Jacques Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 17 3 2 5 0.294 0.1133 0.1133 0.4280 0.4280
2021-22 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 52 31 45 76 1.462 0.3170 0.3152 1.1308 1.1242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SR 33 4 4 8 0.242
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA JR 34 4 2 6 0.176
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA SO 37 5 5 10 0.270
2022-23 RIT D1 AHA FR 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · RIT
-66.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14388
Forward overall
#729
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.