IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Kramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 27 3 5 8 0.296 0.0587 0.0587 0.1350 0.1350
2021-22 — USHL 48 6 6 12 0.250 0.1475 0.1424 0.7509 0.7250
2022-23 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 53 8 13 21 0.396 0.2337 0.2135 1.1899 1.0871
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA GR 22 2 2 4 0.182
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA SR 22 0 4 4 0.182
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA JR 16 0 3 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2023-24 · Bentley
+18.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31781
Forward overall
#1877
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Harris
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.