← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Pelletier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0798 0.0798 0.3123 0.3123
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 49 9 5 14 0.286 0.1064 0.1105 0.4163 0.4325
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 13 17 30 0.577 0.2149 0.2127 0.8406 0.8321
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 20 25 45 0.833 0.3104 0.2930 1.2142 1.1463
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 34 5 6 11 0.324
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC 29 3 5 8 0.276
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2024-25 · Princeton
+23.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23291
Forward overall
#1264
Forward born in 2003
#1353
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.