IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 59 5 11 16 0.271 0.0910 0.1006 0.2510 0.2775
2019-20 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 54 12 15 27 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4627 0.4627
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 18 1 1 2 0.111 0.0428 0.0428 0.1617 0.1617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 17 4 0 4 0.235
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2021-22 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 29 0 1 1 0.035
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2021-22 · Dartmouth
-59.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48660
Forward overall
#3132
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Cody Milan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2008-09
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Barkwell
Adrian · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2011-12
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.