IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Lundberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-08 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.1127 0.1127 0.3509 0.3509
2020-21 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 19 5 7 12 0.632 0.2492 0.2492 0.7758 0.7758
2021-22 — USHL 50 7 4 11 0.220 0.1298 0.1221 0.6482 0.6098
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 54 7 24 31 0.574 0.2039 0.1901 0.6027 0.5620
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC GR 29 8 10 18 0.621
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC SR 18 6 3 9 0.500
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC JR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Utica
+198.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24346
Forward overall
#1364
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cass
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.