← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Wilkie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0350 0.0350 0.1325 0.1325
2021-22 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 23 0 2 2 0.087 0.0223 0.0217 0.0645 0.0628
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 52 9 33 42 0.808 0.1150 0.1043 0.3351 0.3040
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 24 3 6 9 0.375
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 25 3 2 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Salem State
+197.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16423
Defenseman overall
#2921
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.