← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Wutzke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0223 0.0223 0.0619 0.0619
2021-22 SJHL 29 1 7 8 0.276 0.0797 0.0778 0.2077 0.2026
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 34 13 18 31 0.912 0.1957 0.1862 0.4465 0.4249
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 JR 21 1 4 5 0.238
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 SO 18 2 12 14 0.778
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 FR 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · UMass Dartmouth
+147.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9891
Defenseman overall
#1530
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.