← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Lavigne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0512 0.0512 0.1482 0.1482
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0193 0.0193 0.0729 0.0729
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 2 16 18 0.346 0.1334 0.1279 0.5044 0.4836
2022-23 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 6 17 23 0.426 0.1641 0.1493 0.6206 0.5646
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 24 1 11 12 0.500
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 26 4 2 6 0.231
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Albertus Magnus
+231.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14442
Defenseman overall
#2702
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.