IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Lalonde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Powell River Kings BCHL 53 18 23 41 0.774 0.2981 0.3153 1.1258 1.1907
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 36 16 17 33 0.917 0.3532 0.3563 1.3341 1.3457
2023-24 Brooks Bandits AJHL 45 18 35 53 1.178 0.3950 0.3795 1.0899 1.0471
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 50 32 30 62 1.240 0.4778 0.4360 1.8046 1.6467
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 38 13 24 37 0.974
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2025-26 · Merrimack
+175.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6958
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2004
#95
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Rozak
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.