IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Rubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 2 4 6 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2019-20 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 5 14 19 0.633 0.1255 0.1255 0.2885 0.2885
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 8 26 34 0.680 0.2620 0.2636 0.9896 0.9956
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 30 3 13 16 0.533
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 17 2 3 5 0.294
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 30 4 9 13 0.433
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 26 1 4 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Princeton
-2.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7727
Defenseman overall
#1790
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Fitzpatrick
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Sweeney
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.