← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Delaney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 37 8 23 31 0.838 0.4672 0.4672 0.6774 0.6774
2021-22 Chicago Steel USHL 47 2 9 11 0.234 0.1438 0.1542 0.6894 0.7392
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 60 10 18 28 0.467 0.2869 0.2927 1.3750 1.4028
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 62 11 32 43 0.694 0.4263 0.4138 2.0432 1.9831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 35 3 17 20 0.571
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 35 9 9 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2024-25 · UMass Lowell
+64.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14087
Forward overall
#656
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.