IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Andrew Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 59 13 17 30 0.508 0.1383 0.1383 0.3205 0.3205
2020-21 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.1554 0.1554 0.3601 0.3601
2021-22 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 13 17 30 0.556 0.2070 0.2061 0.8096 0.8060
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 30 4 8 12 0.400
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA JR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Canisius
+13.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31600
Forward overall
#1868
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.