IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Kim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Langley Rivermen BCHL 49 13 10 23 0.469 0.1809 0.1938 0.6831 0.7319
2022-23 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 15 14 29 0.537 0.2069 0.2116 0.7815 0.7991
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 47 16 33 49 1.043 0.4017 0.3923 1.5173 1.4819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 35 5 7 12 0.343
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Holy Cross
-1.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18044
Forward overall
#903
Forward born in 2004
#796
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.