← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Seymour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tilton NE-Prep 30 16 25 41 1.367 0.3855 0.3855 0.6254 0.6254
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 19 20 39 1.444 0.4075 0.4075 0.6610 0.6610
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0664 0.0664 0.1854 0.1854
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 35 9 13 22 0.629 0.2086 0.1914 0.5826 0.5346
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 38 9 8 17 0.447
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 34 7 12 19 0.559
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA 37 5 10 15 0.405
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Holy Cross
-47.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14390
Forward overall
#648
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.