← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Devlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 53 9 13 22 0.415 0.1247 0.1247 0.2841 0.2841
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0255 0.0255 0.0713 0.0713
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 4 18 22 0.407 0.1518 0.1451 0.5936 0.5673
2022-23 Coquitlam Express BCHL 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.0847 0.0768 0.3312 0.3003
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC GR 34 0 5 5 0.147
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 30 1 3 4 0.133
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2023-24 · Princeton
-15.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18258
Defenseman overall
#3111
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2021-22
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.