IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Richter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0928 0.0949 0.2647 0.2706
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 9 7 16 0.281 0.1042 0.1012 0.2972 0.2887
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 28 26 54 0.900 0.3342 0.3081 0.9529 0.8785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 — JR 19 4 3 7 0.368
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 — SO 26 2 4 6 0.231
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 — FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · St. Thomas
+72.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15684
Forward overall
#615
Forward born in 1991
#1184
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Woodliffe
Northland · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.