IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Richter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0919 0.0939 0.2639 0.2698
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 9 7 16 0.281 0.1031 0.1001 0.2963 0.2878
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 28 26 54 0.900 0.3307 0.3049 0.9500 0.8758
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 19 4 3 7 0.368
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 26 2 4 6 0.231
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · St. Thomas
+74.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20314
Forward overall
#747
Forward born in 1991
#1348
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Krupcyznski
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Zak
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.