IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landyn Greatorex Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 28 6 7 13 0.464 0.1789 0.1848 0.6765 0.6988
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 3 13 16 0.615
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 26 16 25 41 1.577
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 7 16 23 0.920
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 21 4 3 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Salem State
+110.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32513
Forward overall
#1955
Forward born in 2003
#1837
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Principato
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.389 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Collazo
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.