IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Pilosof Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Pickering Panthers OJHL 10 2 3 5 0.500 0.1226 0.1432 0.3443 0.4020
2018-19 Pickering Panthers OJHL 54 1 18 19 0.352 0.0863 0.0965 0.2423 0.2711
2019-20 Pickering Panthers OJHL 52 15 26 41 0.788 0.1933 0.1933 0.5429 0.5429
2020-21 Northern Cyclones NCDC 9 1 6 7 0.778 0.3171 0.3171 0.6252 0.6252
2021-22 Pickering Panthers OJHL 32 20 28 48 1.500 0.3677 0.3578 1.0328 1.0049
2022-23 Pickering Panthers OJHL 31 17 16 33 1.065 0.2609 0.2405 0.7329 0.6756
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 20 3 1 4 0.200
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17996
Forward overall
#949
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Beale
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.