← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nico Grabas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-29 Country: Canada
Canisius
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0963 0.1092 0.3638 0.4124
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 36 3 4 7 0.194 0.0749 0.0812 0.2829 0.3068
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 45 7 16 23 0.511 0.1969 0.2045 0.7438 0.7725
2024-25 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 52 17 30 47 0.904 0.3482 0.3442 1.3153 1.3000
2025-26 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 31 45 76 1.520 0.5857 0.5574 2.2121 2.1051
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8876
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 2005
#198
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Canisius Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2024-25
0.52
actual FR PPG at Canisius
BCHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Canisius
NAHL 2024-25
0.33
actual FR PPG at Canisius
BCHL 2015-16
0.51
actual FR PPG at Canisius

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.