IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Gross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-23 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — AJHL 4 2 2 4 1.000 0.3318 0.3318 0.9268 0.9268
2020-21 — AJHL 9 2 4 6 0.667 0.2212 0.2212 0.6179 0.6179
2021-22 — USHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.2138 0.2078 1.0247 0.9959
2022-23 — USHL 54 7 32 39 0.722 0.4439 0.4083 2.1277 1.9573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 36 18 23 41 1.139
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 36 9 16 25 0.694
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 34 7 13 20 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
+109.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lee Stubbs
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.