IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Gross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-23 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — AJHL 4 2 2 4 1.000 0.3354 0.3354 0.9254 0.9254
2020-21 — AJHL 9 2 4 6 0.667 0.2236 0.2236 0.6170 0.6170
2021-22 — USHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.2052 0.1994 1.0446 1.0152
2022-23 — USHL 54 7 32 39 0.722 0.4260 0.3919 2.1691 1.9953
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 36 18 23 41 1.139
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 36 9 16 25 0.694
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 34 7 13 20 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
+118.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.