← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Morrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0990 0.0990 0.2625 0.2625
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 8 0 7 7 0.875 0.4879 0.4879 0.7075 0.7075
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 35 3 5 8 0.229 0.1405 0.1426 0.6735 0.6834
2022-23 USHL 30 5 2 7 0.233 0.1434 0.1381 0.6873 0.6617
2023-24 BCHL 43 13 10 23 0.535 0.1993 0.1872 0.7794 0.7320
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 36 7 9 16 0.444
2024-25 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA 32 11 10 21 0.656
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2024-25 · Michigan Tech
+357.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33521
Forward overall
#2038
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.