| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | St. Cloud Norsemen | NAHL | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0990 | 0.0990 | 0.2625 | 0.2625 |
| 2020-21 | Islanders Hockey Club | NCDC | 8 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.875 | 0.4879 | 0.4879 | 0.7075 | 0.7075 |
| 2021-22 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 35 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.229 | 0.1405 | 0.1426 | 0.6735 | 0.6834 |
| 2022-23 | — | USHL | 30 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.233 | 0.1434 | 0.1381 | 0.6873 | 0.6617 |
| 2023-24 | — | BCHL | 43 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 0.535 | 0.1993 | 0.1872 | 0.7794 | 0.7320 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | SO | 36 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.444 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan Tech | D1 | CCHA | — | 32 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.656 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.