IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan Frias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Georges NE-Prep 22 1 1 2 0.091 0.0256 0.0256 0.0416 0.0416
2021-22 St. Georges NE-Prep 25 11 17 28 1.120 0.3160 0.3160 0.5125 0.5125
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 51 24 15 39 0.765 0.2849 0.2988 1.1142 1.1684
2023-24 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 54 14 19 33 0.611 0.2276 0.2282 0.8904 0.8929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SO 31 6 15 21 0.677
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC — 30 7 5 12 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2024-25 · Yale
+82.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19252
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Penner
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Mock
Becker · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.