IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Carone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 9 18 27 0.509 0.1898 0.1869 0.7422 0.7308
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 9 33 42 0.778 0.2897 0.2720 1.1333 1.0639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Holy Cross
-10.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21319
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 2003
#1198
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Heeres
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Lewis
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.