IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Brant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 41 2 1 3 0.073 0.0282 0.0280 0.1064 0.1057
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 31 20 13 33 1.065

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#62315
Forward overall
#4436
Forward born in 2003
#3478
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frank Pew
Neumann · 2001-02
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Butcher
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Robertson
Norwich · 2013-14
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.