← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gustav Portillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-04 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1973 0.1973 0.6141 0.6141
2020-21 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 19 5 4 9 0.474 0.1869 0.1869 0.5818 0.5818
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.1106 0.1067 0.5524 0.5331
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.2949 0.2693 1.4731 1.3450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 30 6 12 18 0.600
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 27 4 6 10 0.370
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 1 6 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · St. Norbert
+43.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28189
Forward overall
#1637
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.