IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Delay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 48 1 5 6 0.125 0.0768 0.0774 0.3683 0.3714
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 42 7 17 24 0.571 0.2128 0.2082 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35416
Forward overall
#2171
Forward born in 2003
#3254
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

JJ Alger
Roger Williams · 2022-23
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nico Gonzalez
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.