IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Kyrkostas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kimball Union NE-Prep 29 10 33 43 1.483 0.2937 0.2937 0.6756 0.6756
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 19 36 55 1.667 0.3302 0.3302 0.7593 0.7593
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 23 25 48 0.889 0.3425 0.3396 1.2936 1.2827
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 13 44 57 1.056 0.4067 0.3828 1.5362 1.4460
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · RPI
-46.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9606
Forward overall
#380
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.