IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oskar Komarov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-06 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HIFK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 19 5 3 8 0.421 0.2279 0.2279 0.6254 0.6254
2021-22 HIFK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 31 4 1 5 0.161 0.0873 0.0915 0.2396 0.2511
2022-23 HIFK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 39 17 16 33 0.846 0.4580 0.4602 1.2568 1.2629
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 18 21 39 0.736 0.2741 0.2599 1.0721 1.0164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 32 4 3 7 0.219
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 37 2 5 7 0.189
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Maine
-35.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16649
Forward overall
#832
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Sleeth
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.