IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conyr Hellyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 52 14 18 32 0.615 0.2042 0.2221 0.5704 0.6204
2022-23 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 48 30 31 61 1.271 0.4217 0.4378 1.1778 1.2228
2023-24 Penticton Vees BCHL 43 12 16 28 0.651 0.2426 0.2409 0.9489 0.9423
2024-25 Penticton Vees BCHL 44 11 19 30 0.682 0.2540 0.2395 0.9935 0.9366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 36 0 4 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2025-26 · Clarkson
-45.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16827
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.