IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Silverberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 53 7 13 20 0.377 0.1252 0.1378 0.3498 0.3849
2022-23 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 44 11 23 34 0.773 0.2564 0.2694 0.7161 0.7525
2023-24 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 40 19 27 46 1.150 0.3816 0.3830 1.0658 1.0698
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 35 8 8 16 0.457
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 29 0 5 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Dartmouth
-40.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11144
Forward overall
#474
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Baillargeon
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Walker Harris
Wesleyan · 2015-16
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.