IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-03 Country: Canada
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — AJHL 34 2 11 13 0.382 0.1283 0.1320 0.3539 0.3641
2024-25 — BCHL 55 7 31 38 0.691 0.2662 0.2611 1.0055 0.9861
2025-26 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 53 17 27 44 0.830 0.3199 0.3020 1.2082 1.1404
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4029
Defenseman overall
#1041
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Justin Gibson
NAHL 2023-24
0.22
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Matthew Rafalski
NAHL 2024-25
0.24
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Adam Mahler
NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Jordin Palmer
NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.