← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-07 Country: Canada
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 30 0 1 1 0.033 0.0128 0.0144 0.0485 0.0544
2022-23 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 28 1 5 6 0.214 0.0826 0.0886 0.3119 0.3347
2023-24 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 49 0 10 10 0.204 0.0786 0.0807 0.2970 0.3051
2024-25 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 50 8 20 28 0.560 0.2158 0.2108 0.8150 0.7963
2025-26 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 45 4 22 26 0.578 0.2226 0.2093 0.8409 0.7907
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8068
Defenseman overall
#1867
Defenseman born in 2005
#1746
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.22
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NAHL 2024-25
0.24
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.96
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.