← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Fechner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-25 Country: Canada
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 26 1 3 4 0.154 0.0516 0.0584 0.1423 0.1612
2022-23 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 45 2 13 15 0.333 0.1118 0.1211 0.3084 0.3341
2023-24 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 31 6 9 15 0.484 0.1623 0.1682 0.4478 0.4639
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 52 28 26 54 1.038 0.3483 0.3424 0.9610 0.9446
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 26 28 54 1.019 0.3926 0.3734 1.4828 1.4102
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12441
Forward overall
#596
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2021-22
1.52
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NAHL 2022-23
0.43
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
BCHL 2023-24
0.24
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
CCHL 2022-23
0.20
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2024-25
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.