← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Fitzpatrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-29 Country: Canada
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brooks Bandits AJHL 19 6 5 11 0.579 0.1942 0.2021 0.5356 0.5575
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 53 8 10 18 0.340 0.1308 0.1298 0.4939 0.4903
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 53 34 24 58 1.094 0.4216 0.4030 1.5915 1.5213
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Stonehill D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22709
Forward overall
#1246
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NAHL 2021-22
1.52
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NAHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NAHL 2022-23
0.43
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.