IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Duncan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-17 Country: USA
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 22 3 2 5 0.227 0.0450 0.0450 0.1036 0.1036
2023-24 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 23 4 10 14 0.609 0.1206 0.1206 0.2773 0.2773
2024-25 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 47 14 12 26 0.553 0.2032 0.2040 0.5839 0.5862
2025-26 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 54 28 47 75 1.389 0.5103 0.4872 1.4660 1.3997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11192
Forward overall
#514
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Justin Barker
AJHL 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Joel Lehtinen
NAHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Jake LaRusso
NAHL 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Zachary Aben
NAHL 2023-24
0.37
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Motz
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.