← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Friedman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-29 Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 28 10 23 33 1.179 0.2335 0.2335 0.5370 0.5370
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Powell River Kings BCHL 20 5 9 14 0.700 0.2697 0.2632 1.0187 0.9942
2025-26 Powell River Kings BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.1809 0.7277 0.6834
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26374
Forward overall
#1508
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.