IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kieran Chung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-17 Country: England
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 39 6 29 35 0.897 0.1314 0.1472 0.4395 0.4922
2022-23 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 45 11 32 43 0.956 0.1399 0.1494 0.4681 0.5000
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 24 3 8 11 0.458
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 9 1 3 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · St. Scholastica
+217.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8221
Defenseman overall
#1883
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Schwartzmiller
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Holland
Utica · 2016-17
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.