← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Wachtel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-25 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.0416 0.0416 0.0946 0.0946
2023-24 Brunswick NE-Prep 33 2 7 9 0.273 0.0548 0.0548 0.1247 0.1247
2024-25 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.1002 0.1027 0.3781 0.3877
2025-26 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 52 23 21 44 0.846 0.3260 0.3223 1.2307 1.2166
2026-27 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 6 6 2 8 1.333 0.5137 0.5137 1.9392 1.9392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30105
Forward overall
#1578
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
BCHL 2022-23
0.49
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2019-20
0.73
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.