IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Neu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-14 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NAHL 50 5 9 14 0.280 0.1029 0.1082 0.2955 0.3109
2024-25 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 33 9 11 20 0.606 0.2335 0.2293 0.8821 0.8664
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 53 27 34 61 1.151 0.4434 0.4192 1.6749 1.5836
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13072
Forward overall
#644
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Hewitt
BCHL 2022-23
0.49
actual FR PPG at Army
Zach Evancho
OJHL 2015-16
0.62
actual FR PPG at Army
Colin Bilek
NAHL 2017-18
0.45
actual FR PPG at Army
Mason Krueger
NAHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.