IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Biakabutuka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 2 5 7 0.250 0.0705 0.0705 0.1144 0.1144
2023-24 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 7 11 18 0.692 0.1953 0.1953 0.3168 0.3168
2024-25 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 5 7 12 0.226 0.0843 0.0871 0.3299 0.3408
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Holy Cross
+35.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14586
Defenseman overall
#2638
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Kulas
Neumann · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Lamirande
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.