IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Muldowney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-05 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #172  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nichols NE-Prep 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0322 0.0322 1.9642 2.0760
2022-23 — USHL 61 15 14 29 0.475 0.2804 0.2818 1.4006 1.4075
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 34 17 12 29 0.853
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 39 29 18 47 1.205
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 35 5 9 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · UConn
+156.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16402
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.