← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-24 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #143  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 USHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.3074 0.3193 1.4731 1.5301
2022-23 USHL 56 9 18 27 0.482 0.2963 0.2924 1.4204 1.4015
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 31 5 9 14 0.452
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast 27 2 1 3 0.111
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 28 3 4 7 0.250
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 28 3 4 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · UMass
-3.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16049
Forward overall
#795
Forward born in 2004
#1592
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.