IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Lepper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-10 Country: Canada
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 47 1 11 12 0.255 0.0654 0.0693 0.1924 0.2040
2024-25 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 51 6 33 39 0.765 0.1959 0.1972 0.5764 0.5803
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 9 33 42 0.778 0.2997 0.2882 1.1319 1.0884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5636
Defenseman overall
#1415
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Charlie Banquier
BCHL 2022-23
0.32
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Adam Mahler
NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Matthew Rafalski
NAHL 2024-25
0.24
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Justin Gibson
NAHL 2023-24
0.22
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Harris
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Burmaster
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.