IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Banquier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 47 1 5 6 0.128 0.0506 0.0506 0.1341 0.1341
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 1 18 19 0.333 0.1321 0.1340 0.3499 0.3550
2022-23 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 53 6 15 21 0.396 0.1476 0.1393 0.5773 0.5449
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA JR 35 3 8 11 0.314
2024-25 Stonehill D1 AHA — 31 2 8 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Stonehill
+149.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14029
Defenseman overall
#2664
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Huffnagle
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Cooper
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.